![]() ![]() Participants’ narratives show how ethnicity and religion have become politicized into an ethnopolitical conflict. ![]() Participants use metadiscourse as part of a narrative to give voice to self or other in making an argument about the situation in Malaysia. More common are uses of metadiscourse to characterize prior problematic situations or what is needed in the future. However, there are few instances of such metadiscourse in the over 2-hour discussion. ![]() But how does dialogue actually work in practice? In this study, metadiscourse – talk about talk – is used as a resource to get at how participants understand their own discussion, for example, ‘we should have dialogues like this’ or ‘as long as we continue talking and trying to find solutions we have a hope of finding a solution if we don’t talk there won’t be any chance for a solution’. Dialogue is widely recognized as a worthwhile communication activity to deal with the differences and issues between peoples. A small group of ethnically and religiously diverse Malaysians were assembled to discuss the recent call for ‘1 Malaysia’. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |